Editorial Reviews
From the Back Cover
About the Author
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
Cryptozoology A To Z
The Encyclopedia Of Loch Monsters Sasquatch Chupacabras And Other Authentic MBy Loren Coleman
Fireside
Copyright © 1999 Loren Coleman
All right reserved.
ISBN: 0684856026
Abominable Snowman
When most people ponder on the “big three” of cryptozoology, they are thinking of the Loch Ness Monsters, Bigfoot, and the Abominable Snowman. Though many assume these beasts to be mythical, a body of intriguing evidence exists for each. Of the three, the Abominable Snowman is the cryptozoological animal longest known and discussed in the West.
The more proper name is Yeti, but most Westerners have been more familiar with the moniker “Abominable Snowman.” “Abominable Snowman” is a phrase coined, accidentally, by a Calcutta Statesman newspaper columnist, Henry Newman, in 1921.
It happened when Newman wrote about the 1921 sighting by Lieutenant Colonel (later Sir) C.K. Howard-Bury and his party, who saw dark forms moving about on a twenty-thousand-foot-high snowfield above their location, the Lhapka-La pass on the Tibetan side of the Himalayan mountains, and viewed them through binoculars. This is the first credible Western sighting of what until then had been mostly a shadowy tale (at least to Westerners) of strange, hairy upright creatures in Tibet, Bhutan, Sikkim, Mustang, and Nepal. Howard-Bury would later, on September 22, 1921, find footprints “three times those of normal humans” at the site where the dark forms were moving about.
The Sherpas insisted that the prints were those of the metoh-kangmi, as Howard-Bury rendered it. Kang-mi loosely means “snow creature.” The metoh part should have been written as met-teh, which translates as “man-sized wild creature.”
Newman’s mistake was caused in part by Howard-Bury’s mistransliteration of the Sherpa word. Howard-Bury did not understand that the Sherpas recognized several types of creatures; on this occasion they had used a generic, not a specific, term. The error was compounded when Newman changed Howard-Bury’s metoh-kangmi to metch kangmi, which he explained as a Tibetan word meaning “Abominable Snowman.”
In any case, this proved to be a pivotal event in cryptozoological history. As Ivan T. Sanderson wrote, “The result was like the explosion of an atomic bomb.” The melodramatic name “Abominable Snowman” spurred gigantic press interest. Newspaper coverage multiplied as more and more expeditions sought to climb Mount Everest.
The true origin of the phrase “Abominable Snowman” has been misrepresented over the years. For example, on a 1992 episode of the television series Unsolved Mysteries, a well-known Irish explorer wrongly claimed that the creature got its name because of its horrible odor.
The real animal behind the name is neither abominable nor a true creature of the snows. These beasts usually appear to live in quiet retreat in the steamy mountain valleys of the Himalayas, using the snowy passes as a way to move from one spot to another, leaving behind huge mysterious footprints. They are not — contrary to another widespread misunderstanding — white. And they are not a single creature.
A better generic term for Abominable Snowman is the Sherpa yeti, loosely meaning “that there thing.” Yetis are known as huge creatures — humanoid beasts, covered with thick coats of dark fur with arms, like those of anthropoid apes, which reach down to their knees.
A description of the reportedly three types of Yeti is discussed, in depth, within that entry.
Copyright © 1999 by Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark
Zuiyo-maru Monster
In April 1977, thirty miles off the coast of Christchurch, New Zealand, the trawler’s nets of a Japanese fishing boat, the Zuiyo-maru, snared a huge animal carcass of an unknown origin. The crew hauled the monstrous body out of the ocean onto the deck, and Michihiko Yano, the ship’s assistant production manager, measured the creature and took some now-famous photographs. The creature was thirty-three feet long and weighed about four thousand pounds. It had a snakelike head at the end of a long, slender neck, giving it an unwhale-like appearance. Some of the crew thought it was a rotten whale, but others were not so sure. After great difficulty, the stinking Zuiyo-maru Monster was thrown overboard.
Media attention in Japan focused on the plesiosaur-like appearance of the creature. Interest in Sea Serpents rose. Toys were produced of the Zuiyo-maru Monster.
But Yano had taken samples of the “horny fiber” from one of the monster’s fins. Tests determined the Zuiyo-maru Monster was a decomposed basking shark, although few today know that part of the story.
Copyright © 1999 by Loren Coleman and Jerome Clark
Continues…
Excerpted from Cryptozoology A To Zby Loren Coleman Copyright © 1999 by Loren Coleman. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Important information
To report an issue with this product, click here.
Stephen brannon, jt –
This is a light hearted, and entertaining read. Although this book at first may seem to be targeted at younger readers, as much content about cryptids is, I can assure you it is a fun research piece with a great resource guide to match.
Muhammad Muhaimin Bin Muhammad Din Ninuk –
CJC Prime member –
My college aged son wanted this book because he’s always found Cryptozoology interesting.Over the years he’s collected many book & objects on that subject, but never found anything that was up-to-date with current discoveries!He loves how this Cryptozoology encyclopedia is so well organized and written with so many newly discovered enteries with descriptions that truly give the reader a visual of beasts only vaguely describes in the past!It’s a fun read with incredible findings & collaborations from Jerome Clark!Anyone interested in Cryptozoology will find this a perfect addition to their collection or who’s just starting out & needs a good foundation of information to build on!
Peaches –
I gave as a Christmas present to someone very interested in Cryptids. Found out it was an earlier edition so it may not include newer and more recently discovered Cryptids but for it to be printed in 1999, it’s definitely worth the price and worth buying. Satisfied with my purchase!
vicky torres –
This is a very good book that gives overviews of many cryptids from around the world….HOWEVER it also spends MUCH of its time on prominent Cryptozoologists. Sometimes even more than it does on the cryptids.Also some of the entries are now out of date and give information we now know was either hoaxed or just plain WRONG. A prime example would be the Menehune. It lists this as a sort of island locked cousin to the Bigfoot. We now know that Menehune means “Low in Status” and NOT “Short in stature” like it used to be thought. The Menehune were in fact the original population, and work force of Hawaii. We have their artifacts and other evidence of them. There is a Menehune MUSEUM on Kauai.The book is good and is still a good edition to your Cryptozoology library, but cross research on its entries is a good idea because as I said before, it is showing its age.
MARTI FODDRILL –
I’ve enjoyed it however I didn’t realize it was written in the 90’s. Some “cryptids” are now officially recognized (such as the tree kangaroo) and there has been huge advancements in science, DNA, and in general in how we view the world. There are also new experts to the field and so are no longer with us. Loren is, thank goodness!
Kara Danvers –
There is no reference to Mothman, the Fresno Nightcrawlers, and a few other well known cryptids. Very disappointed.
T. Fricke –
I bought this for my husband, who is a long-time cryptozoology nut. He has thoroughly enjoyed reading this book in bed every night since I gave it to him. The book is great for having a basic overview of each cryptid out there, and a picture when one is available. Ideal for someone who wants to attain “oh yeah, I’ve heard of that!” status on all those weird animals that are not supposed to exist. Some criticize the book for including too many sections on cryptozoologists, when we really care far more about the animals than the people who study them. True, there’s a lot of who’s who included in this book, that my husband doesn’t particularly care about. But he finds that negligible. One can always skip the Dr. So-and-so portions if not interested. Meanwhile, the cryptid info that dominates the book is still really good and really fascinating.
florens –
Parfait
Produit ok et je recommande ce vendeur
SUSAN B –
Returned
Returned